|
Post by biminitwisted on May 15, 2024 13:50:48 GMT -5
While I agree on the right to defend yourself I don’t think Jefferson considered a future where a single shooter could put 1000 rounds down range. Killing 58 and wounding 800. Do you think the framers thought about an internet filled with cucks and paid communist insurgents that try to undermine our Constitution? Those same guys, being Deists, believed Jesus was just some dude.
|
|
|
Post by pinman on May 15, 2024 14:19:30 GMT -5
Saw this explanation under an article titled "Things Legal Gun Owners are Tired of Hearing" Spot on assessment.
"The Second Amendment is outdated and was never intended for modern firearms."
This argument challenges the applicability of the Second Amendment to contemporary society, questioning the right to own modern firearms. It overlooks the principle that the right to self-defense and resistance to tyranny is timeless, transcending the specific technology available at any period. The debate around the Second Amendment often involves a complex discussion of historical context, legal interpretations, and individual rights. Moreover, this viewpoint fails to acknowledge the importance many Americans place on constitutional rights as living, adaptable foundations of the nation.
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 15, 2024 15:36:20 GMT -5
Do you think the framers thought about an internet filled with cucks and paid communist insurgents that try to undermine our Constitution? Those same guys, being Deists, believed Jesus was just some dude. They were headed in the right direction
|
|