|
Post by biminitwisted on May 11, 2024 23:15:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on May 11, 2024 23:17:38 GMT -5
I've got plenty more. Should I continue?
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on May 12, 2024 8:15:58 GMT -5
Thanks Einstein, but that doesn’t equate to what you said about the odds being greater. All it says is that teens do stupid things as teens have always done. I have yet to hear of a single incidence of what you’re claing to be true actually happening, let alone meeting the high bar of your claim. How about three at the top of my search simple search. I guess kids aren't the only ones doing stupid shit. A third-grade boy was able to snake a finger inside a school resource officer's holster earlier this month, firing one shot from the officer’s department-issued Glock 22 pistol into the floor of a Minnesota gymnasium earlier this month, Maplewood Police confirmed. A high school student in Michigan is accused of grabbing a sheriff deputy’s holster during a struggle after he allegedly assaulted his ex-girlfriend in a school hallway in August. He grabbed the officer’s retention holster so hard that the weapon fired, discharging one bullet through the bottom of the holster, hitting the floor and ricocheting into a wall, according to ABC affiliate WJRT. The same month in Kansas, school resource officers were called to Garden City High School to deal with a student who was upset and agitated. When the 16-year old student saw one of the officers, he began yelling and threatening the officer. A struggle ensued and the boy tried to grab the officer’s gun, Garden City Police said in a media release.abcnews.go.com/US/students-grabbing-guns-officers-highlights-dangers-weapons-school/story?id=53413914Thanks. There are three. Now substantiate your claim with a source that says what you claimed. Good luck, you’ll need it.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on May 12, 2024 8:17:44 GMT -5
I've got plenty more. Should I continue? You can give as many anecdotal instances as you care to. Still waiting to see a source that verifies your claim. My guess is it’s as fictional as most of what you say on the forum.
|
|
|
Post by pinman on May 12, 2024 9:49:04 GMT -5
I've got plenty more. Should I continue? Half the stories you supplied were officers who carry the firearm exposed and none of the stories include an incident of kids overpowering a Teacher to get their gun.
|
|
|
Post by pinman on May 12, 2024 10:22:20 GMT -5
While I agree on the right to defend yourself I don’t think Jefferson considered a future where a single shooter could put 1000 rounds down range. Killing 58 and wounding 800. This is another one of the worst arguments for gun control. In the same light as if the founders could envision pornography when they drafted the 1st Amendment it would have mattered somehow.
|
|
|
Post by swampdog on May 12, 2024 19:49:01 GMT -5
If a teacher is armed it should be concealed and no one but perhaps the administrators know. I actually am still weighing in on this. I think better control through technology is my preference, with an onsite security guard and a dog (trained to alert to gun powder). We had law enforcement tell us a friendly with a firearm could be mistaken for an active shooter when they arrived on scene.
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on May 12, 2024 20:55:08 GMT -5
If a teacher is armed it should be concealed and no one but perhaps the administrators know. I actually am still weighing in on this. I think better control through technology is my preference, with an onsite security guard and a dog (trained to alert to gun powder). We had law enforcement tell us a friendly with a firearm could be mistaken for an active shooter when they arrived on scene. Pretty sure that’s the way it works in FL. Teachers choose to get certified. They carry concealed. Only the administrators and the school resource officer know who’s armed.
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on May 13, 2024 5:44:11 GMT -5
If a teacher is armed it should be concealed and no one but perhaps the administrators know. I actually am still weighing in on this. I think better control through technology is my preference, with an onsite security guard and a dog (trained to alert to gun powder). We had law enforcement tell us a friendly with a firearm could be mistaken for an active shooter when they arrived on scene. Yep
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 13, 2024 6:00:52 GMT -5
I've got plenty more. Should I continue? Please continue. You're the best 1am Googler we've got
|
|
|
Post by johngalt on May 13, 2024 9:20:17 GMT -5
While I agree on the right to defend yourself I don’t think Jefferson considered a future where a single shooter could put 1000 rounds down range. Killing 58 and wounding 800. Actually Jefferson and the other framers of the Constitution didn’t envision a godless, corrupt, degenerate society. 😉
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 14, 2024 21:21:00 GMT -5
While I agree on the right to defend yourself I don’t think Jefferson considered a future where a single shooter could put 1000 rounds down range. Killing 58 and wounding 800. Actually Jefferson and the other framers of the Constitution didn’t envision a godless, corrupt, degenerate society. 😉 You are correct. Thats the exact reason there's a second amendment.
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on May 14, 2024 21:47:45 GMT -5
Actually Jefferson and the other framers of the Constitution didn’t envision a godless, corrupt, degenerate society. 😉 You are correct. Thats the exact reason there's a second amendment. 2nd amendment, protects all the other amendments.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on May 14, 2024 21:57:42 GMT -5
You are correct. Thats the exact reason there's a second amendment. 2nd amendment, protects all the other amendments. AMEN !
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 15, 2024 11:33:47 GMT -5
While I agree on the right to defend yourself I don’t think Jefferson considered a future where a single shooter could put 1000 rounds down range. Killing 58 and wounding 800. Do you think the framers thought about an internet filled with cucks and paid communist insurgents that try to undermine our Constitution?
|
|