|
|
Post by Captj on Apr 23, 2024 7:47:31 GMT -5
Whether it's a BS case or not the prosecution is going to air a lot of dirty laundry pertaining to the bible toting, self acclaimed p---- grabber. Guilty or not, the legal system is configured to cost the defendant a lot of money, time, and stress. The only people who think he's innocent of any of the charges are the Maggot followers. Bullshit case being defined by them as any case brought against their hero.
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Apr 23, 2024 9:00:40 GMT -5
and the more popular the left makes Trump... The left is "george floyding" Trump. People identify the rough behavior of the state against them.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 23, 2024 9:01:17 GMT -5
If they convict tfg of his crimes they can convict any of us for our crimes
|
|
|
|
Post by johngalt on Apr 23, 2024 9:03:12 GMT -5
And people here criticize Putin for his antics. 🤔🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 11:48:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tampaspicer on Apr 23, 2024 12:14:28 GMT -5
Ol Donald looks a little stressed out from all of his court visits. Wonder how he's going to feel in a few months.  |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 13:08:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 15:15:28 GMT -5
Perhaps our Trump humping friends can explain how making a secret deal with a national publication to catch and kill negative stories, especially sexual ones, about you while promoting positive coverage of you and negative stories about your opponents isn't illegal?
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 23, 2024 15:28:45 GMT -5
Perhaps our Trump humping friends can explain how making a secret deal with a national publication to catch and kill negative stories, especially sexual ones, about you while promoting positive coverage of you and negative stories about your opponents isn't illegal? Well, it isn’t illegal. Do you think that’s what he’s being prosecuted for? |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 15:41:29 GMT -5
Perhaps our Trump humping friends can explain how making a secret deal with a national publication to catch and kill negative stories, especially sexual ones, about you while promoting positive coverage of you and negative stories about your opponents isn't illegal? Well, it isn’t illegal. Do you think that’s what he’s being prosecuted for? Well, depending on how it was documented and reported it can most certainly be illegal. Violations of campaign finance laws are actual crimes. This is what he's being prosecuted for.  |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 16:22:10 GMT -5
For the record there were about six people out their on his behalf yesterday.  |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 23, 2024 16:43:49 GMT -5
Well, it isn’t illegal. Do you think that’s what he’s being prosecuted for? Well, depending on how it was documented and reported it can most certainly be illegal. Violations of campaign finance laws are actual crimes. This is what he's being prosecuted for. That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. |
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 23, 2024 16:53:38 GMT -5
Todays' gag-order hearing did not go well for DJT or his attorneys.
Any sanctions have yet to be announced, though there's time for it.
( the trial is not in session tomorrow )
For the MAGA faithful, the Pecker testimony must have been hard to swallow.
( so to speak )
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 23, 2024 17:18:59 GMT -5
That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. Funny that a guy in your position plays so fast and loose with the law. Especially considering that the evidence of criminal activity hasn’t even been presented yet. I wonder what NY prosecutors would opine about prosecutions in your jurisdiction? They would probably think us to be backwards and naive because we find political prosecutions offensive and an affront to justice. The cynical usually look down on the idealistic. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 17:21:34 GMT -5
Well, depending on how it was documented and reported it can most certainly be illegal. Violations of campaign finance laws are actual crimes. This is what he's being prosecuted for. That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. Ironically, you seem to be a bit inconsistent in regards to the credibility of grand juries and respect for statutes and law. |
|
|
|
Post by conchydong on Apr 23, 2024 17:31:39 GMT -5
Bimini I am not a lawyer but I think you are the one who is confused about the law.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 17:42:29 GMT -5
Bimini I am not a lawyer but I think you are the one who is confused about the law. Here’s a crazy idea, let’s see what a jury and the courts have to say. |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 23, 2024 18:40:42 GMT -5
That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. Ironically, you seem to be a bit inconsistent in regards to the credibility of grand juries and respect for statutes and law. I’m only doubting New York’s credibility. |
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 23, 2024 18:54:54 GMT -5
I’m sure that the NY judicial system cares about the thoughts of a small town prosecutor …
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 23, 2024 18:58:17 GMT -5
I’m sure that the NY judicial system cares about the thoughts of a small town prosecutor … They probably hold the same disdain for me as they do any of their fellow Americans who aren’t partisan liberals like they are. “Flyover country” as they reckon it. |
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Apr 23, 2024 19:50:47 GMT -5
Despite his reputation it seems David Pecker is an upstanding guy.
It must be hard to testify in court and I hope he doesn't go soft on Trump.
|
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 23, 2024 20:17:32 GMT -5
Did the jury swallow the Pecker?
Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 23, 2024 20:18:55 GMT -5
I’m sure that the NY judicial system cares about the thoughts of a small town prosecutor … They probably hold the same disdain for me as they do any of their fellow Americans who aren’t partisan liberals like they are. “Flyover country” as they reckon it. Flyover country does not exactly have the best reputation for fairness of prosecutions, Especially when it comes to certain traditionally targeted groups, historically speaking. Old, rich, White guys obviously excluded, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Apr 23, 2024 20:48:36 GMT -5
seems Trump ignored the gag order when Pecker stood up  |
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 24, 2024 6:33:24 GMT -5
'Logistical nightmare': NY Times reveals Secret Service is planning for Trump to be jailed
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 24, 2024 7:29:58 GMT -5
Well, depending on how it was documented and reported it can most certainly be illegal. Violations of campaign finance laws are actual crimes. This is what he's being prosecuted for. That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. Pretty sure falsifying tax returns in New York is not "garbage" and highly illegal. If Trump paid a porn star with corporate money and deducted as a legal expense on his tax records, that is fraud. He would be guilty of fraud. He should have pled guilty back in 2022 and ended this thing then by paying the taxes he owed and any fines due. I am sure he could have made a deal with prosecutors. This case began back in 2017, hardly a political move to interfere with the 2024 election. Trump has fought and delayed this thing every step of the way to be sure it was an issue during this election. |
|
|
|
Post by gandy on Apr 24, 2024 7:40:11 GMT -5
They (his haters) will keep slinging shit until he is buried, in the public eye and by (legal 🤣) standards.
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 24, 2024 7:47:54 GMT -5
That’s garbage and affirms what I suspected all along about this prosecution. Arguing that Trump or someone on his behalf fudged a business record to call hush money “legal fees” is a stretch, but might technically be some violation of New York state law. But to say Trump is violating campaign contribution laws because his personal buddy who owns the Enquirer is using Freedom of the Press to help the candidate he wants, is stupid. All politicians do that. We need to start calling every conversation a Democrat has with their liberal buddies in mainstream media an illegal campaign contribution if this sticks. Pretty sure falsifying tax returns in New York is not "garbage" and highly illegal. If Trump paid a porn star with corporate money and deducted as a legal expense on his tax records, that is fraud. He would be guilty of fraud. He should have pled guilty back in 2022 and ended this thing then by paying the taxes he owed and any fines due. I am sure he could have made a deal with prosecutors. This case began back in 2017, hardly a political move to interfere with the 2024 election. Trump has fought and delayed this thing every step of the way to be sure it was an issue during this election. I did say that. The “garbage” part are the allegations of Federal election fraud that the Feds themselves didn’t prosecute. Its not election fraud to have your buddy that owns a magazine help you out in the election by running favorable stories of you while suppressing unfavorable stories. That’s politics 101 and staggering hypocritical for any Democrat to go after. The Democratic party is nothing but a massive political machine that operates on the same principles. |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 24, 2024 7:51:06 GMT -5
They probably hold the same disdain for me as they do any of their fellow Americans who aren’t partisan liberals like they are. “Flyover country” as they reckon it. Flyover country does not exactly have the best reputation for fairness of prosecutions, Especially when it comes to certain traditionally targeted groups, historically speaking. Old, rich, White guys obviously excluded, of course. Of course. Southern whites are the new blacks. The group that its ok to disparage, because they’re really, really, bad and deserve it. No hypocrisy there. Every bigot feels their bigotry is justified. That the “Other” they hate is the one Other that deserves it. Yourself and your libs included. Your bigotry is ok. Because you’re “right.” |
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Apr 24, 2024 8:10:03 GMT -5
I’m sure that the NY judicial system cares about the thoughts of a small town prosecutor … What an arrogant thing to say. I appreciate his legal opinion. |
|
