Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2024 7:10:31 GMT -5
🦶
Trump
🦶
Trump
🦶
Trump
LISTEN TO THE FOOTSTEPS !!!
HES COMING 👍
😂🤣😊😘
|
|
|
|
Post by Captj on Apr 19, 2024 7:21:18 GMT -5
How's the thermostat set in prison? Mark my words, he's going to suffer a medical emergency when all else fails. |
|
|
|
Post by hig on Apr 19, 2024 12:59:40 GMT -5
Maybe he will follow his good friend Jeffery's example.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 19, 2024 16:25:05 GMT -5
NYPD identified the man who self-immolated outside of Trump's trial as Maxwell Azzarello, from Florida. Say the pamphlets he threw before lighting himself were conspiratorial in nature.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 19, 2024 16:26:28 GMT -5
NYPD identified the man who self-immolated outside of Trump's trial as Maxwell Azzarello, from Florida. Say the pamphlets he threw before lighting himself were conspiratorial in nature. Anyone check on BB? |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 19, 2024 17:35:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 19, 2024 17:39:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Captj on Apr 19, 2024 19:00:29 GMT -5
Two words: He's fucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Apr 19, 2024 19:03:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 19, 2024 19:03:55 GMT -5
Exactly which hunt is that?
The Hunt For Red October?
Or, is it the way Trump blabs off about the capabilities of our submarine fleet?
|
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Apr 19, 2024 19:18:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Apr 19, 2024 19:20:02 GMT -5
Exactly which hunt is that?
The Hunt For Red October?
Or, is it the way Trump blabs off about the capabilities of our submarine fleet? |
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Apr 19, 2024 19:26:36 GMT -5
As if the multitude of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors weren't enough, now I have to chide you guys about font size too?
Man, this is exhausting!
|
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 19, 2024 20:19:55 GMT -5
We're already on to Next Monday. It will be a Double Header! The trial, of course, plus, as an extra added attraction, a Hearing! Why? Well, sports fans, Donald J. Trump, convicted of fraud, submits to the Court a fraudulent bond! You cannot make this stuff up! The Court of Appeals did Trump a huge favor, and cut $400+ million down to $175 million. What does Trump do in response to this gift? ... He takes a leak on their shoes! His odds of successful appellate review are now in negative numbers! The company supposedly responsible isn't registered to do business in New York State. That's just for starters ... not having enough cash to cover it doesn't exactly look good either. It goes downhill from there. Yes, it gets even worse! Read all about it: thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4606053-ny-ag-trump-civil-fraud-judge-declare-175m-bond-without-effect/Can you smell the Toast? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2024 14:37:41 GMT -5
🦶 Trump 🦶 Trump 🦶 Trump LISTEN TO THE FOOTSTEPS !!! HES COMING 👍 😂🤣😊😘 |
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Apr 21, 2024 15:06:42 GMT -5
You've supported Chicago democratic party criminals all your life.
The transition to the republican side seems to have been easy for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 21, 2024 15:16:39 GMT -5
You've supported Chicago democratic party criminals all your life. The transition to the republican side seems to have been easy for you. Now that's not fair. Just know that all his contributions to the coffers to keep Brandon in office for a second term are appreciated. Not to mention the funds that helped him all his political career. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2024 15:26:25 GMT -5
🦶 Trump 🦶 Trump 🦶 Trump LISTEN TO THE FOOTSTEPS !!! HES COMING 👍 😂🤣😊😘 SO LADIES. ………… “ ”GET READY HERE I COME” Temptations 1968 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2024 15:33:08 GMT -5
😂🤣😂🤣😊
|
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Apr 22, 2024 9:00:53 GMT -5
You're really showing your intellect now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2024 10:50:35 GMT -5
😜🤪. Wat u means?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2024 10:53:06 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2024 10:55:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 22, 2024 11:52:13 GMT -5
www.foxnews.com/politics/ny-vs-trump-evidence-prosecutors-can-present-former-president-testifiesThis will result in an instant overturning of a conviction. You’re not allowed to bring in someone’s dirty laundry into a trial unless it amounts to : 1. Felony convictions (only that a person was convicted of X number of felonies, no details about them) if the person testified. 2. Convictions for crimes of dishonesty (theft, fraud, ect.), again if the person testifies and no details about them. 3. If charged with a sex offense, prior sexual misconduct. The rules on this will not vary much by state because they have Constitutional implications. For example, if Trump is charged with armed robbery and has 10 prior convictions for armed robbery, the jury can’t know about the 10 priors. Unless Trump testifies, in which the jury only gets to know Trump is a 10 time convicted felon. They don’t get to know the 10 priors are for robberies. There’s no world in which civil lawsuits are relevant to this criminal trial in a way that outweighs their prejudicial effect. The Judge had to be a rube to not know this. This is Evidence 101. Therefore, I can only conclude that the Judge isn’t interested in making the conviction stick. He only wants it to effect the 2024 election in November. If it gets overturned a couple of years later, it won’t matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 22, 2024 12:18:29 GMT -5
www.foxnews.com/politics/ny-vs-trump-evidence-prosecutors-can-present-former-president-testifiesThis will result in an instant overturning of a conviction. You’re not allowed to bring in someone’s dirty laundry into a trial unless it amounts to : 1. Felony convictions (only that a person was convicted of X number of felonies, no details about them) if the person testified. 2. Convictions for crimes of dishonesty (theft, fraud, ect.), again if the person testifies and no details about them. 3. If charged with a sex offense, prior sexual misconduct. The rules on this will not vary much by state because they have Constitutional implications. For example, if Trump is charged with armed robbery and has 10 prior convictions for armed robbery, the jury can’t know about the 10 priors. Unless Trump testifies, in which the jury only gets to know Trump is a 10 time convicted felon. They don’t get to know the 10 priors are for robberies. There’s no world in which civil lawsuits are relevant to this criminal trial in a way that outweighs their prejudicial effect. The Judge had to be a rube to not know this. This is Evidence 101. Therefore, I can only conclude that the Judge isn’t interested in making the conviction stick. He only wants it to effect the 2024 election in November. If it gets overturned a couple of years later, it won’t matter. The news article I read said the ruling took place after what’s known as a “Sandoval” hearing. This is the link to the original case it was based on. www.nycourts.gov/reporter/archives/p_sandoval.htmForbes gave more details about it than Fox did. www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/22/prosecutors-can-ask-trump-about-fraud-case-e-jean-carroll-if-he-testifies-judge-rules/?sh=1e1cba2868d9 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2024 12:24:10 GMT -5
The whole point is to influence the 2024 election. It has nothing to do with convictions.
This is election interference. Plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by gandy on Apr 22, 2024 12:28:06 GMT -5
They (his haters) will keep slinging shit until he is buried, in the public eye and by (legal 🤣) standards.
Sad a man that gave up the lavish lifestyle to help his country gets slammed so bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 22, 2024 12:39:03 GMT -5
Captain Stinky Pantload is upset that his followers aren't turning out to riot on his behalf.  |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 22, 2024 12:41:42 GMT -5
www.foxnews.com/politics/ny-vs-trump-evidence-prosecutors-can-present-former-president-testifiesThis will result in an instant overturning of a conviction. You’re not allowed to bring in someone’s dirty laundry into a trial unless it amounts to : 1. Felony convictions (only that a person was convicted of X number of felonies, no details about them) if the person testified. 2. Convictions for crimes of dishonesty (theft, fraud, ect.), again if the person testifies and no details about them. 3. If charged with a sex offense, prior sexual misconduct. The rules on this will not vary much by state because they have Constitutional implications. For example, if Trump is charged with armed robbery and has 10 prior convictions for armed robbery, the jury can’t know about the 10 priors. Unless Trump testifies, in which the jury only gets to know Trump is a 10 time convicted felon. They don’t get to know the 10 priors are for robberies. There’s no world in which civil lawsuits are relevant to this criminal trial in a way that outweighs their prejudicial effect. The Judge had to be a rube to not know this. This is Evidence 101. Therefore, I can only conclude that the Judge isn’t interested in making the conviction stick. He only wants it to effect the 2024 election in November. If it gets overturned a couple of years later, it won’t matter. The news article I read said the ruling took place after what’s known as a “Sandoval” hearing. This is the link to the original case it was based on. www.nycourts.gov/reporter/archives/p_sandoval.htmForbes gave more details about it than Fox did. www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/22/prosecutors-can-ask-trump-about-fraud-case-e-jean-carroll-if-he-testifies-judge-rules/?sh=1e1cba2868d9I’ve have to look on greater detail at the case later, but the case appears to regard prior criminal convictions. Trump’s civil suits are a totally different creature. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 22, 2024 12:49:18 GMT -5
He's attacking a witness in the case in violation of the gag order just prior to that witnesses testimony, but it's okay, because , reasons.
|
|
