|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 14, 2024 20:06:50 GMT -5
The more he runs off at the mouth, the more desperate he appears.
Though he has competent, experienced, attorneys this time, there's a limit.
When your client is guilty as hell, options for defense are few and far between.
I predict that Trump's deteriorating nervous system will betray him.
Whether or not he's wired on an Rx, he won't be able to control himself.
He's going to be on display, every grimace, twitch, and muttered remark.
His butt is on the line, and his butt is huge.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 14, 2024 20:14:11 GMT -5
Yup, not being able to throw a temper tantrum and storm out of the courtroom is going to drive that crazy fuck nuts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2024 20:18:58 GMT -5
Funny, I can't seem to recall the dates of Slick Willy's criminal trial. Yes but he remained as popular as ever. That is the key. All this law-fare is boosting Trump up to unbelievable levels of popularity. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2024 20:24:23 GMT -5
Rich white guy treatment= get tried in state court for a Federal misdemeanor as a felony charge
Poor black guy treatment = murder, riot and steal. Get released without bail and have charges dismissed for no reason whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 14, 2024 22:08:32 GMT -5
Funny, I can't seem to recall the dates of Slick Willy's criminal trial. Yes but he remained as popular as ever. That is the key. All this law-fare is boosting Trump up to unbelievable levels of popularity. That's some funny, yet sadly delusional, shit right there. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 14, 2024 22:51:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 15, 2024 5:24:45 GMT -5
Well isn’t the idea behind all of these scam trials just to keep him from campaigning? Is this the trial that was a minor misdemeanor that the prosecutor blew up to a FEDERAL FELONY (because of the fact that the statute of limitations had expired) and although it is a FEDERAL FELONY they are going to try it in STATE COURT mainly because no FEDERAL PROSECUTOR would prosecute the case because there is no case? Yeah right this isn’t a political prosecution and serious election interference. My goodness, how much BS can someone expect the public to swallow. The hush money case is state felony charges. He was indicted by a New York grand jury. Not sure what you are talking about. The civil penalty case he is appealing was past the statute of limitations for some criminal charges. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2024 5:31:27 GMT -5
I’m talking about obviously coordinated election interference. Please quit ignoring the obvious. These actions are an attack on our democracy.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 15, 2024 6:49:41 GMT -5
Happy First Trump Criminal Trial Day, to All Who Celebrate!
|
|
|
|
Post by gandy on Apr 15, 2024 9:04:36 GMT -5
I’m talking about obviously coordinated election interference. Please quit ignoring the obvious. These actions are an attack on our democracy. I said something similar before. They (his haters) will keep slinging shit until he is buried, in the public eye and by (legal  ) standards. Sad a man that gave up the lavish lifestyle to help his country gets slammed so bad. Will we get the play by play of the Stormy Daniels reruns? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2024 9:08:54 GMT -5
I’m talking about obviously coordinated election interference. Please quit ignoring the obvious. These actions are an attack on our democracy. I said something similar before. They (his haters) will keep slinging shit until he is buried, in the public eye and by (legal ) standards. Sad a man that gave up the lavish lifestyle to help his country gets slammed so bad. Will we get the play by play of the Stormy Daniels reruns? It’s a fact that is lost on many. Trump’s life was perfect before he ran for president. He gave up a lot to serve his country. Not that it matters but he also donated his presidential salary. I really don’t know but did Biden do the same? |
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Apr 15, 2024 10:29:44 GMT -5
He didn’t donate shit
|
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 15, 2024 11:03:58 GMT -5
newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2024/04/15/study-least-90-tv-news-fails-call-trump-prosecutors-democrats“Despite the obvious political implications of such a prosecution, a new study of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage shows at least 90% of their coverage failed to inform viewers that Bragg and the other elected Democrats going after Trump are “Democrats.” It’s as if the networks prefer to disingenuously portray the indictments and civil lawsuits as the work of nonpartisan career prosecutors, rather than as partisan attempts to use the court system to hobble the electoral prospects of the country’s top Republican.”
|
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on Apr 15, 2024 11:31:32 GMT -5
I’m talking about obviously coordinated election interference. Please quit ignoring the obvious. These actions are an attack on our democracy. Oh really? So the January 6th buttheads were there as tourists? That was an attack on democracy. Trumps trials are well deserved. He earned them all. Suck it up. |
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Apr 15, 2024 11:32:36 GMT -5
newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2024/04/15/study-least-90-tv-news-fails-call-trump-prosecutors-democrats“Despite the obvious political implications of such a prosecution, a new study of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage shows at least 90% of their coverage failed to inform viewers that Bragg and the other elected Democrats going after Trump are “Democrats.” It’s as if the networks prefer to disingenuously portray the indictments and civil lawsuits as the work of nonpartisan career prosecutors, rather than as partisan attempts to use the court system to hobble the electoral prospects of the country’s top Republican.” Those three "news" organizations are so biased. I love watching their Sunday political programming and laugh at the blatant biased in their programming. George Snuffaluffagus was very comical yesterday on his program This Week. He puts republicans on his program to pretend he is impartial and then just disagrees with them and cuts them off at any given moment. Fox news and NPR are no different with their blatant biased reporting. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 11:53:06 GMT -5
newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2024/04/15/study-least-90-tv-news-fails-call-trump-prosecutors-democrats“Despite the obvious political implications of such a prosecution, a new study of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage shows at least 90% of their coverage failed to inform viewers that Bragg and the other elected Democrats going after Trump are “Democrats.” It’s as if the networks prefer to disingenuously portray the indictments and civil lawsuits as the work of nonpartisan career prosecutors, rather than as partisan attempts to use the court system to hobble the electoral prospects of the country’s top Republican.” What happened to all that faith you place in grand juries? |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 15, 2024 12:08:44 GMT -5
newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2024/04/15/study-least-90-tv-news-fails-call-trump-prosecutors-democrats“Despite the obvious political implications of such a prosecution, a new study of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage shows at least 90% of their coverage failed to inform viewers that Bragg and the other elected Democrats going after Trump are “Democrats.” It’s as if the networks prefer to disingenuously portray the indictments and civil lawsuits as the work of nonpartisan career prosecutors, rather than as partisan attempts to use the court system to hobble the electoral prospects of the country’s top Republican.” What happened to all that faith you place in grand juries? When they’re made up of partisan Democrats with TDS, I have little faith in them to neutrally do justice. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 12:14:39 GMT -5
What happened to all that faith you place in grand juries? When they’re made up of partisan Democrats with TDS, I have little faith in them to neutrally do justice. So no Republican can get a fair trial in NY, but cops are held to account by grand juries in Florida? Because, reasons. |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 15, 2024 12:19:50 GMT -5
When they’re made up of partisan Democrats with TDS, I have little faith in them to neutrally do justice. So no Republican can get a fair trial in NY, but cops are held to account by grand juries in Florida? Because, reasons. Because… my experience is that hard-core liberals generally aren’t fair or neutral individuals when it comes to evaluating claims about Trump. TDS is a real thing. I am certain that you would convict Trump of a serious crime even if any other neutral juror would find the case to be a sham. You would have your mind made up before anything was presented, and if you doubt that, you would definitely convict on the slightest evidence to hang your hat on. You want to convict him. You’re only looking for an excuse to. Multiply yourself by several hundred thousand people in NYC, and you have an inherently sham system. |
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Apr 15, 2024 12:44:55 GMT -5
It's all a sham...... Not a single one of us would be standing trial for this. It's a true shame what our country has become
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Apr 15, 2024 12:47:45 GMT -5
Is this like the Chisholm Trail or the Liberal Trail of Tears?
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 13:28:08 GMT -5
So no Republican can get a fair trial in NY, but cops are held to account by grand juries in Florida? Because, reasons. Because… my experience is that hard-core liberals generally aren’t fair or neutral individuals when it comes to evaluating claims about Trump. TDS is a real thing. I am certain that you would convict Trump of a serious crime even if any other neutral juror would find the case to be a sham. You would have your mind made up before anything was presented, and if you doubt that, you would definitely convict on the slightest evidence to hang your hat on. You want to convict him. You’re only looking for an excuse to. Multiply yourself by several hundred thousand people in NYC, and you have an inherently sham system. I get it. That's probably the way the victims of police misconduct feel about the systems you cherry pick as fair in your view. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 13:32:04 GMT -5
Sad, low energy.
Haberman: Trump appeared to be asleep. His head would fall down… He didn’t pay attention to a note his lawyer passed him. His jaw kept falling on his chest and his mouth kept going slack.
|
|
|
|
Post by gandy on Apr 15, 2024 13:52:19 GMT -5
Will we get the play by play of the Stormy Daniels reruns?  |
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Apr 15, 2024 14:49:10 GMT -5
Funny, I can't seem to recall the dates of Slick Willy's criminal trial. thats because hillary threatened to kill them bitches if they opened there mouth. that or they were paid off and kept there mouths shut. after 50 plus visits to epsteins sex island not 1 women talking bout banging bill, now thats power. |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 15:10:50 GMT -5
Who's “Sleepy”, now?
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 15:20:28 GMT -5
🎶 Sleepy Don, what’s that bronzer you have on? Could it be a darker orange from days gone by? And did I hear them say, you were sleeping in court today, you can’t make yourself look sadder if you tri-ied.’🎶
|
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Apr 15, 2024 15:29:30 GMT -5
Sad, low energy. Haberman: Trump appeared to be asleep. His head would fall down… He didn’t pay attention to a note his lawyer passed him. His jaw kept falling on his chest and his mouth kept going slack. why dont you grab a eight ball and 2 pornstars and stay up all night, see how alert you are the next morning. give the guy a break. |
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Apr 15, 2024 15:58:18 GMT -5
Because… my experience is that hard-core liberals generally aren’t fair or neutral individuals when it comes to evaluating claims about Trump. TDS is a real thing. I am certain that you would convict Trump of a serious crime even if any other neutral juror would find the case to be a sham. You would have your mind made up before anything was presented, and if you doubt that, you would definitely convict on the slightest evidence to hang your hat on. You want to convict him. You’re only looking for an excuse to. Multiply yourself by several hundred thousand people in NYC, and you have an inherently sham system. I get it. That's probably the way the victims of police misconduct feel about the systems you cherry pick as fair in your view. But you know I’m right on this… |
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 15, 2024 16:04:38 GMT -5
I get it. That's probably the way the victims of police misconduct feel about the systems you cherry pick as fair in your view. But you know I’m right on this… |
|
) standards.
