|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 2, 2024 9:02:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Nov 2, 2024 10:19:08 GMT -5
LOL ...
Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania voters who sent defective mail-in ballots to cast provisional ones in person
Justices leave in place a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that Republicans say violates the U.S. Constitution.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday handed a loss to Republicans by allowing Pennsylvania voters who sent mail-in ballots that were flagged as being potentially defective to submit a separate provisional in-person ballot.
The justices rejected, with no noted dissents, a Republican request to put on hold a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling from last week.
The Supreme Court action marks "an important reaffirmation of the right to vote in Pennsylvania," said Ben Geffen, a lawyer who represented voters in the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Nov 2, 2024 11:43:23 GMT -5
Amazing that Pubs don’t want legitimate votes to be counted.
|
|
|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 2, 2024 11:47:55 GMT -5
Amazing that Pubs don’t want legitimate votes to be counted. Yeah, just terrible that the republicans only want votes counted that conform to the current law. Just terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Nov 2, 2024 13:35:37 GMT -5
Why does a date matter if it has been received at the supervisor of elections office a week before Election Day?
|
|
|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 2, 2024 15:34:22 GMT -5
Why does a date matter if it has been received at the supervisor of elections office a week before Election Day? It matters because it is the law. I guess there is the law for a reason but that doesn't matter . |
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Nov 2, 2024 18:39:53 GMT -5
Oh, but it does, silly Kemper.
You would be far better off if you posted Fox News articles and just sat back and said nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 2, 2024 18:42:03 GMT -5
Oh, but it does, silly Kemper.
You would be far better off if you posted Fox News articles and just sat back and said nothing.
No, the reason for the law has no bearing on the issue of whether or not the law was broken. |
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Nov 2, 2024 18:43:12 GMT -5
Seems someone missed the obvious sarcasm.
Whoda thunkit?🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Nov 2, 2024 18:47:50 GMT -5
Oh, but it does, silly Kemper.
You would be far better off if you posted Fox News articles and just sat back and said nothing.
No, the reason for the law has no bearing on the issue of whether or not the law was broken. In your mind, perhaps, but that's wrong again....and, even more to the point, has no bearing on the issue at hand in the case.
If you'd like to understand why that is, please read this article from Fox News:
Get it yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Nov 2, 2024 19:45:18 GMT -5
Oh look... progressives love fraudulent ballots, wonder why.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Nov 2, 2024 20:20:09 GMT -5
Oh look... progressives love fraudulent ballots, wonder why. Mistakes or oversights are not fraud, giving the parties a chance to remedy the oversight seems to be a great way to spilt the baby. |
|
|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 2, 2024 20:36:08 GMT -5
No, the reason for the law has no bearing on the issue of whether or not the law was broken. In your mind, perhaps, but that's wrong again....and, even more to the point, has no bearing on the issue at hand in the case.
If you'd like to understand why that is, please read this article from Fox News:
Get it yet?
We were both incorrect as it wasn't a law . It was common practice ,but there was no law that said they had to do this a certain way. From your link - "....most county boards of elections, and most Pennsylvania courts to consider the issue, have counted provisional ballots submitted by voters who had made a disqualifying mistake in attempting to complete their mail ballots." |
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Nov 3, 2024 14:49:52 GMT -5
You were the only one who called it a law, or do you have trouble reading too?
Maybe stick to denigrating veterans because they disagree with you politically, sucker, as that seems to work out much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Nov 3, 2024 17:04:18 GMT -5
Why does a date matter if it has been received at the supervisor of elections office a week before Election Day? Documents across all business matters must the signed and dated. Why do you have a problem on ballots? |
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Nov 3, 2024 17:09:04 GMT -5
Why does a date matter if it has been received at the supervisor of elections office a week before Election Day? Documents across all business matters must the signed and dated. Why do you have a problem on ballots? No problem, contact the voter and explain there is an issue with their ballot. Give them a chance to remedy the discrepancy. |
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Nov 3, 2024 17:22:24 GMT -5
Documents across all business matters must the signed and dated. Why do you have a problem on ballots? No problem, contact the voter and explain there is an issue with their ballot. Give them a chance to remedy the discrepancy. Sure |
|
|
|
Post by kemper2 on Nov 3, 2024 18:25:34 GMT -5
You were the only one who called it a law, or do you have trouble reading too? Maybe stick to denigrating veterans because they disagree with you politically, sucker, as that seems to work out much better. You spend too much time concentrating on punctuation to be able to follow along. I said- " No, the reason for the law has no bearing on the issue of whether or not the law was broken. " To which you responded- " Oh, but it does, silly Kemper. " We were both talking about it in the context of it being a law . You were saying the reason for the law " does " has bearing on the issue of whether or not the law was broken. That should be easy to see when looking at how I presented the facts here in this post. |
|
