|
|
Post by resinhead on Sept 6, 2024 9:10:17 GMT -5
Surprise surprise
the video is from CNBC. Jones posted it. Shoot the messenger!
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Sept 6, 2024 9:49:55 GMT -5
They will rationalize as unimportant because Jones reports it... Progressives only care about power at any cost. Actual problems is not an issue they are interested in...
|
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Sept 6, 2024 11:20:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by misterjr on Sept 6, 2024 11:23:12 GMT -5
Golden, Alex Jones calling someone else a liar!
|
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Sept 6, 2024 11:34:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Sept 6, 2024 11:38:42 GMT -5
That’s around a million jobs. No lying and scamming going on. They will probably justify it by “being within the margin of error “
Wake up America!
😂🤣😘🤣😂🤣😂🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Sept 6, 2024 13:37:58 GMT -5
I think you fail to see that more jobs are still being reported, Payroll numbers are increasing and more people are working. Jobs numbers are always adjusted every month, every qtr, every year. This is due to how the estimates are determined. The final numbers are not tabulated off actual tax reports until over a year later. It isn't anyone lying and it certainly isn't bad news if more and more people are employed.
It is just putting a political spin on the issue to rile up some people who do not understand where and how the data is collected and the events that can affect the estimates.
Plus there is an issue with the Biden Administration conspiracy theory that they are lying about job numbers. If they were lying about job numbers, why revise them down now before the election? If they were doing that, they would continue the lie until after the election and then revise the numbers. Do you guys ever think to look at this logically? if they were lying about the job numbers to help Harris, they would not correct the data now.
The initial estimates are based on surveys sent to a few hundred thousand employers and they use that data to predict the numbers for millions of employers nationwide. Then adjustments are made when the state unemployment tax reports are filed and actual numbers reported. These are then verified against the federal UC tax reports when they are filed to generate the final numbers. A lot of factors can cause fluctuations in the prediction and analysts and statisticians will be pouring over the data in the next few months to see what issues caused it and how they can adjust the model to help make future estimates more accurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Sept 6, 2024 13:50:11 GMT -5
I think you fail to see that more jobs are still being reported, Payroll numbers are increasing and more people are working. Jobs numbers are always adjusted every month, every qtr, every year. This is due to how the estimates are determined. The final numbers are not tabulated off actual tax reports until over a year later. It isn't anyone lying and it certainly isn't bad news if more and more people are employed. It is just putting a political spin on the issue to rile up some people who do not understand where and how the data is collected and the events that can affect the estimates. Plus there is an issue with the Biden Administration conspiracy theory that they are lying about job numbers. If they were lying about job numbers, why revise them down now before the election? If they were doing that, they would continue the lie until after the election and then revise the numbers. Do you guys ever think to look at this logically? if they were lying about the job numbers to help Harris, they would not correct the data now. The initial estimates are based on surveys sent to a few hundred thousand employers and they use that data to predict the numbers for millions of employers nationwide. Then adjustments are made when the state unemployment tax reports are filed and actual numbers reported. These are then verified against the federal UC tax reports when they are filed to generate the final numbers. A lot of factors can cause fluctuations in the prediction and analysts and statisticians will be pouring over the data in the next few months to see what issues caused it and how they can adjust the model to help make future estimates more accurate. So based on your last few thoughts, we should just accept employment numbers that have been off by close to a million jobs, because by-golly-goshdangit, dem poor boys just made an honest mistake? Same mistake this week too? The mistakes this year are historic, not mormal, btw. ADP produces much more accurate numbers every week, in case any body cared, but of course good ole uncle Sam would never use those. |
|
|
|
Post by resinhead on Sept 6, 2024 14:21:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nuevowavo on Sept 6, 2024 14:49:30 GMT -5
Looks like we had a pretty good downward revision in 2019, too. Nothing to see here, folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reptile Dysfunction on Sept 6, 2024 14:53:23 GMT -5
It sounds like the glory days under the Obama Administration. Those revisors worked overtime back then.
|
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Sept 6, 2024 15:28:41 GMT -5
I think many people don’t want to open their eyes and admit what has been going on for the past almost four years
|
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Sept 6, 2024 15:32:27 GMT -5
How about the last couple of decades?
|
|
|
|
Post by nuevowavo on Sept 6, 2024 15:33:22 GMT -5
I think many people don’t want to open their eyes and admit what has been going on for the past almost four years What happened in 2019? I forget who was president. |
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Sept 6, 2024 15:38:01 GMT -5
Cultists have convenient memories. It's an identifying trait.
They also always answer a question with a question.
|
|
