|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 18, 2024 18:57:33 GMT -5
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. There is no question that false claims were made.
Whats being discussed is whether or not it’s okay to criticize someone’s false claims, if they were in the armed services.
I don’t see why it shouldn’t be. To not question them on their false claims seems foolish at best. To say they are off limits to any criticism of their claim, just because they served is just a little too sheep like for my taste.
Your mileage may vary though.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Aug 18, 2024 19:17:46 GMT -5
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. There is no question that false claims were made. Whats being discussed is whether or not it’s okay to criticize someone’s false claims, if they were in the armed services. I don’t see why it shouldn’t be. To not question them on their false claims seems foolish at best. To say they are off limits to any criticism of their claim, just because they served is just a little too sheep like for my taste. Your mileage may vary though. One is free to criticize those that served, but just don't be surprised when the majority of normal people think you're an asshole for doing so. Especially when solely done for petty political purposes. So, like I said about the misogyny and racism, please proceed.
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Aug 18, 2024 19:23:26 GMT -5
Yes, that... and the fact that Vance never claimed to have been in combat, where Tampon Tim did in fact make that false claim. So... that's a difference worth noticing. I thought your party of would-be tyrants was all about suppressing "disinformation"? Not so much it seems when it's their disinformation. Can your bullshit. It's not my party. Neither party is my party on the national scene. No honorably discharged veteran should be "swift boated". Ferris, Can you share your YouTube video on Vietnam again please? I never book marked it and enjoy watching it.
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 18, 2024 19:25:29 GMT -5
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. There is no question that false claims were made. Whats being discussed is whether or not it’s okay to criticize someone’s false claims, if they were in the armed services. I don’t see why it shouldn’t be. To not question them on their false claims seems foolish at best. To say they are off limits to any criticism of their claim, just because they served is just a little too sheep like for my taste. Your mileage may vary though. One is free to criticize those that served, but just don't be surprised when the majority of normal people think you're an asshole for doing so. Especially when solely done for petty political purposes. So, like I said about the misogyny and racism, please proceed. That’s okay. I think you’re a moron for not. So were even, I guess.🤪 I do not see the criticism as being for any of the reasons you’ve claimed. If that were so, they would have been unlikely to acknowledge the service he actually did give and to thank him for it as they did. I believe there are people that are actually offended by the fact that he would embellish his service record for selfish reasons (I can’t really think of any reason to do so that would also be be selfish).
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Aug 18, 2024 19:51:14 GMT -5
Even morons know it's "we're".
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Aug 18, 2024 20:18:33 GMT -5
Can your bullshit. It's not my party. Neither party is my party on the national scene. No honorably discharged veteran should be "swift boated". Ferris, Can you share your YouTube video on Vietnam again please? I never book marked it and enjoy watching it. I don't have a video on Youtube of any kind.
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Aug 18, 2024 20:21:50 GMT -5
Ferris, Can you share your YouTube video on Vietnam again please? I never book marked it and enjoy watching it. I don't have a video on Youtube of any kind. You shared a YouTube video about Vietnam on the old forum. I thought you made it, my apologies.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Aug 18, 2024 20:50:33 GMT -5
I learned long ago to never bring up Vietnam to a Vietnam Veteran. Many have deep scars that you can’t see
One Veteran said to me in a casual conversation “Hell can’t be as bad as what I went through in Namn”
He was special forces in there for six months at a time for about 10 years. His stories were very unsettling. He never spoke to me about it until we were friends for about five years and then only after he had a bunch of beers
Bless those unsung heroes 🇺🇸
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Aug 18, 2024 20:55:48 GMT -5
I learned long ago to never bring up Vietnam to a Vietnam Veteran. Many have deep scars that you can’t see One Veteran said to me in a casual conversation “Hell can’t be as bad as what I went through in Namn” He was special forces in there for six months at a time for about 10 years. His stories were very unsettling. He never spoke to me about it until we were friends for about five years and then only after he had a bunch of beers Bless those unsung heroes 🇺🇸 And if he served less than 4 years he wouldn’t qualify to be president, in your humble opinion.
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Aug 18, 2024 21:05:37 GMT -5
You just can’t help yourself. He served about 12 years.
But I believe any president would need to serve in the military for enough time to be well versed in military life. I suggested 4 years. Possibly it should be more?
Anyway the person that can send our children to war needs to have military experience. No more no less
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Aug 18, 2024 21:13:33 GMT -5
You just can’t help yourself. He served about 12 years. But I believe any president would need to serve in the military for enough time to be well versed in military life. I suggested 4 years. Possibly it should be more? Anyway the person that can send our children to war needs to have military experience. No more no less So a Medal of Honor winner who only spent 395 days in a war zone would not qualify to run for president of the United States?
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Aug 18, 2024 21:16:35 GMT -5
😬
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Aug 18, 2024 21:18:21 GMT -5
Dummy. I never said they had to be in a war zone at all. Just that they had to serve in the military for a determined amount of time
Now quit TROLLING
I’m done answering your ridiculous questions
|
|
|
Post by illinoisfisherman on Aug 18, 2024 21:18:32 GMT -5
Dummy. I never said they had to be in a war zone at all. Just that they had to serve in the military for a determined amount of time
Now quit TROLLING
I’m done answering your ridiculous questions
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Aug 18, 2024 21:27:55 GMT -5
Dummy. I never said they had to be in a war zone at all. Just that they had to serve in the military for a determined amount of time Now quit TROLLING I’m done answering your ridiculous questions You said a presidential candidate would have to serve a minimum of 4 years in the armed services. My point was a Medal of Honor winner who only spent 395 days in the armed services would not qualify to be president if you ruled the world. Stop running away from it. It’s ok to be wrong.
|
|