|
Post by tonyroma on Apr 24, 2024 13:41:01 GMT -5
It would be the only time I’d be happy to see a female cop, usually those bitches are brutal. Bitches has been used as a term of empowerment.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Apr 24, 2024 13:52:50 GMT -5
It would be the only time I’d be happy to see a female cop, usually those bitches are brutal. Bitches has been used as a term of empowerment. sorry its just like when they have to search you, men for men, women for women. transgenders just get a warning.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 24, 2024 14:37:58 GMT -5
The difficult part, as previously said, is that it can be 'detected' in your system for quite some time. That doesn't mean you're under the influence. How they will be able to detect whether or not you are currently under the influence by the substance will be the tricky part. The amount of THC in the system can be quantified (not quickly or easily), but it also has to be interpreted by an expert that will say X amount is enough to impair someone. That is an opinion and you can have experts disagreeing on whether X amount is enough to impair or not. It would be more efficient to simply figure out a minimum amount that most impassioned experts believe is enough to impair the average person and make that the cutoff for driving with THC in the system. There also needs to be a way to quantify it before a DUI charge is levied. Blood specimens require a warrant in most circumstances in Florida and that’s usually reserved for DUIs involving death or serious bodily injury. There’s going to need to be a way for urine tests to accurately and reliably quantify THC. This spells out all the challenges in great detail. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499672/
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on May 1, 2024 8:32:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by meateater on May 1, 2024 9:25:23 GMT -5
deadbeat crackers with outstanding loans, check. blacks, check. illegals, check. potheads,check. im telling you if he makes beer and live shiners cheaper i may have to change my vote.
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on May 1, 2024 9:33:55 GMT -5
deadbeat crackers with outstanding loans, check. blacks, check. illegals, check. potheads,check. im telling you if he makes beer and live shiners cheaper i may have to change my vote. He needs to fix this beer thing, it’s getting out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on May 1, 2024 17:16:31 GMT -5
Screw the beer, I want free shiners!
|
|
|
Post by Captj on May 1, 2024 18:56:56 GMT -5
IDK. beer vs shiner? beer vs shiner? Let me think about this for a moment..........
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on May 1, 2024 19:02:04 GMT -5
Screw the beer, I want free shiners! I'll give you two for free !!
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on May 1, 2024 22:22:28 GMT -5
Screw the beer, I want free shiners! I'll give you two for free !!
Top shelf sir, clap clap!
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on May 1, 2024 22:55:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nikonoclast on May 1, 2024 23:11:47 GMT -5
One interesting aspect of a re-scheduling by the Federal government is the Direct impact on the states.
Many state pot laws contain a clause that Automatically changes the state schedule to match the Federal.
This will lower penlaties in some jurisdictions beneath the cost of prosecution.
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 3, 2024 5:25:35 GMT -5
One interesting aspect of a re-scheduling by the Federal government is the Direct impact on the states.
Many state pot laws contain a clause that Automatically changes the state schedule to match the Federal.
This will lower penlaties in some jurisdictions beneath the cost of prosecution.
That's a quick fix. States make too much money off of drugs. The revenue will always override sensible maneuvers
|
|
|
Post by Captj on May 4, 2024 5:21:22 GMT -5
The state's policies on drugs is primarily based on economic benefits to the legislators formulating those policies. Kind of reminds me of the amendment passed by voters to fund the buyout of big sugar's land. Somehow it didn't happen and the money went somewhere else. How about the lottery to fund education? Legalization will happen here in Fla., but won't be implemented until our state politicians can figure out how legalization will directly benefit them.
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on May 4, 2024 8:14:41 GMT -5
The state's policies on drugs is primarily based on economic benefits to the legislators formulating those policies. Kind of reminds me of the amendment passed by voters to fund the buyout of big sugar's land. Somehow it didn't happen and the money went somewhere else. How about the lottery to fund education? Legalization will happen here in Fla., but won't be implemented until our state politicians can figure out how legalization will directly benefit them. The money that enforcement loses when weed gets legalized is huge. It must be replaced. Taxes also satisfy the needs of the brain dead masses as a feel good.
|
|