|
Post by cadman on Sept 6, 2024 14:14:09 GMT -5
If she sucks as bad as Biden did, she is in trouble, but I see a completely different debate than what happened the first go around. Biden never challenged Trump at all. He made some comment afterward that he wasn't allowed to fact check hm, which made no sense. Biden never went on the offensive. I anticipate Harris will go on the offense early. I doubt Harris takes the same approach Biden did, but I could be wrong. Harris does appear more stiff then Trump at times and will need to be more relaxed during the debate. It isn't a trial in a courtroom. I will say that Walz will win the VP debate, even though that debate matters a lot less than the Presidential debate. But with Trump's age, some voters might be waiting to see and hear how his VP performs. Walz, so far, has presented the better camera friendly style of communicating, he connects better with a television audience. Looks more relaxed. Trump and Walz would actually make the best debate as they both play to the camera and the audience. Really? He (walz) seems, well, fn Wierd. Who was that candidate years ago that did the “yeahaww!”!thing? Walz reminds me of him. Vance is informed, succinct and delivers solid. Might be a bit militaryish in his delivery but not creepy wierd like Walz Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Sept 6, 2024 14:33:01 GMT -5
yeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Sept 6, 2024 14:33:42 GMT -5
Really? He (walz) seems, well, fn Wierd. Who was that candidate years ago that did the “yeahaww!”!thing? Walz reminds me of him. Vance is informed, succinct and delivers solid. Might be a bit militaryish in his delivery but not creepy wierd like Walz Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say. YOUR FIRED.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Sept 6, 2024 15:35:07 GMT -5
Trump makes Nixon look like Brad Pitt.
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Sept 6, 2024 16:04:22 GMT -5
Really? He (walz) seems, well, fn Wierd. Who was that candidate years ago that did the “yeahaww!”!thing? Walz reminds me of him. Vance is informed, succinct and delivers solid. Might be a bit militaryish in his delivery but not creepy wierd like Walz Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say. Kennedy won the election because Richard Daley fixed the Chicago election, not because of some debate. Fact.
|
|
|
Post by conchydong on Sept 6, 2024 16:18:12 GMT -5
Close, but I think it will be more like, "Vice President Harris, what is your favorite color?".
Perhaps, but unlike yam tits, once answered, one will actually know what her favorite color is. Heck, she may even use complete sentences and not talk about electric sharks. I will ask you again, have you suckled Trump’s tits? You sure know a lot about them. I guess you like his boniatos.
|
|
|
Post by OhMy on Sept 6, 2024 16:24:17 GMT -5
I have never seen someone with more TDS than BT.
There are a few others on here that spout their BS about Trump, but BT is mesmerized by him.
I bet his wife is super annoyed at him yelling at the television or at his computer about Trump.
Just imagine if he used that TDS energy on something productive in his life.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Sept 6, 2024 16:26:25 GMT -5
I have never seen someone with more TDS than BT. There are a few others on here that spout their BS about Trump, but BT is mesmerized by him. I bet his wife is super annoyed at him yelling at the television or at his computer about Trump. Just imagine if he used that TDS energy on something productive in his life. I've had a great year, and I'm thankful for it all.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Sept 6, 2024 16:27:37 GMT -5
Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say. Kennedy won the election because Richard Daley fixed the Chicago election, not because of some debate. Fact. Kennedy won by 82 electoral votes. More states than just illinois.
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Sept 6, 2024 16:38:49 GMT -5
Kennedy used makeup for the TV and he looked great ... Nixon thought it unmanly and refused to wear it. Nixon looked pale, sweaty and sickly.
That turned off women voters.
|
|
|
Post by gardawg on Sept 6, 2024 16:41:49 GMT -5
Kennedy won by 82 electoral votes. More states than just illinois. The Mafiz controlled the West Virginia miners union and delivered enough votes for him to win that state. Then Bobby Kennedy and Jack betrayed them. That's why they conspired with some rogue CIA guys and Cuban veterans of the Bay of Pigs fiasco to whack him. Marcello of NOLA and Trafficante of Tampa provided the shooters. Or so I heard.
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Sept 6, 2024 16:50:07 GMT -5
Kennedy won by 82 electoral votes. More states than just illinois. My bookie took my bet that you would immediately jump back at me to argue. I'm $5000 ahead tonight........thanks!
|
|
|
Post by whitebacon on Sept 6, 2024 16:54:18 GMT -5
I have never seen someone with more TDS than BT. There are a few others on here that spout their BS about Trump, but BT is mesmerized by him. I bet his wife is super annoyed at him yelling at the television or at his computer about Trump. Just imagine if he used that TDS energy on something productive in his life. I've had a great year, and I'm thankful for it all. You have a great year every year.........you get paid to cry about Trump and call people names.......spend 85% of your workday doing it, and get some idiot folks to pay you! Good gig if you can get it I guess
|
|
|
Post by throttle on Sept 6, 2024 18:44:11 GMT -5
Really? He (walz) seems, well, fn Wierd. Who was that candidate years ago that did the “yeahaww!”!thing? Walz reminds me of him. Vance is informed, succinct and delivers solid. Might be a bit militaryish in his delivery but not creepy wierd like Walz Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say. The connection was undeniable the minute I learned that Walz planned his wedding on the date of the Tienanmen massacre and then honeymooned in Red China. How romantic. And perfectly normal. I wonder if he wore a Mao suit instead of a tux...
|
|
|
Post by Captj on Sept 7, 2024 5:53:37 GMT -5
Gore was informed, succinct, and delivered solid answers, also stiff as a board and people hated him. Bush was folksy, funny, and stumbled his words at times, but people loved him. Reagan was folksy, made jokes, and people loved him. I can name others. First TV debate, Nixon was better with the answers, but Kennedy won it and the election because he connected with the camera and the studio audience. People want a connection to a person, not a robot to be in office. Walz connects when he speaks, Vance not so much. Look for the two videos where they visit the local stores and see how each interacts with the workers. Walz makes a connection, Vance just looks like he was forced to do it. In the modern TV and internet era, how you say it is as important as what you say. The connection was undeniable the minute I learned that Walz planned his wedding on the date of the Tienanmen massacre and then honeymooned in Red China. How romantic. And perfectly normal. I wonder if he wore a Mao suit instead of a tux... I'd have to go with the tux.
|
|