|
Post by cadman on Aug 28, 2024 11:48:01 GMT -5
Not making any assertions, just stating which administration was in charge at that time. Zuckerberg makes it quite clear that the FBI asked them to censor the Hunter laptop story. So who at the FBI spread the disinformation? Why is no one being held accountable for that election interference? DeepState Inc. protects it's own. Zuckerberg worded this section very carefully, didn't he? He's trying to indemnify Meta. "Temporairily demoted" my ass; Meta, along with Twitter, YouTube, ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, the NYT, the WaPo, Apple, Amazon, and the rest of the democrat propagandists, including "51 former intelligence officials", never let that story see the light of day. "... the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election. That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply. It's since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn't have demoted the story." Who was the President in 2020 that could have fired those FBI agents?
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Aug 28, 2024 12:11:41 GMT -5
Zuckerberg makes it quite clear that the FBI asked them to censor the Hunter laptop story. So who at the FBI spread the disinformation? Why is no one being held accountable for that election interference? DeepState Inc. protects it's own. Zuckerberg worded this section very carefully, didn't he? He's trying to indemnify Meta. "Temporairily demoted" my ass; Meta, along with Twitter, YouTube, ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, the NYT, the WaPo, Apple, Amazon, and the rest of the democrat propagandists, including "51 former intelligence officials", never let that story see the light of day. "... the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election. That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply. It's since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn't have demoted the story." Who was the President in 2020 that could have fired those FBI agents? Who can even remember who appointed the Republican FBI Director?
|
|
|
Post by throttle on Aug 28, 2024 13:52:35 GMT -5
Zuckerberg makes it quite clear that the FBI asked them to censor the Hunter laptop story. So who at the FBI spread the disinformation? Why is no one being held accountable for that election interference? DeepState Inc. protects it's own. Zuckerberg worded this section very carefully, didn't he? He's trying to indemnify Meta. "Temporairily demoted" my ass; Meta, along with Twitter, YouTube, ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, the NYT, the WaPo, Apple, Amazon, and the rest of the democrat propagandists, including "51 former intelligence officials", never let that story see the light of day. "... the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election. That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply. It's since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn't have demoted the story." Who was the President in 2020 that could have fired those FBI agents? Clearly Trump had no idea of the degree to which the FBI was infested with Deep Staters, nor the lengths they'd go to to obstruct him and help Biden. I remember when the democrat media was incensed that Trump dared accuse the deep state of surveilling his campaign. What won't they do? What lie won't they tell?
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Aug 28, 2024 13:58:35 GMT -5
Zuckerberg makes it quite clear that the FBI asked them to censor the Hunter laptop story. So who at the FBI spread the disinformation? Why is no one being held accountable for that election interference? DeepState Inc. protects it's own. Zuckerberg worded this section very carefully, didn't he? He's trying to indemnify Meta. "Temporairily demoted" my ass; Meta, along with Twitter, YouTube, ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, the NYT, the WaPo, Apple, Amazon, and the rest of the democrat propagandists, including "51 former intelligence officials", never let that story see the light of day. "... the FBI warned us about a potential Russian disinformation operation about the Biden family and Burisma in the lead up to the 2020 election. That fall, when we saw a New York Post story reporting on corruption allegations involving then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's family, we sent that story to fact-checkers for review and temporarily demoted it while waiting for a reply. It's since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn't have demoted the story." Who was the President in 2020 that could have fired those FBI agents? Remember what happened when he questioned the integrity of the FBI? The party of love and lawful behavior shit a brick
|
|
|
Post by Captj on Aug 28, 2024 16:12:30 GMT -5
I chuckle every time I hear or read the term "deep state". I could go along with bloated bureaucracy, or government workers covering their own asses, but "deep state". Nah. Don't even know what that really means.
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Aug 28, 2024 16:20:03 GMT -5
I chuckle every time I hear or read the term "deep state". I could go along with bloated bureaucracy, or government workers covering their own asses, but "deep state". Nah. Don't even know what that really means. It's a gentle way of saying those who should be hanged
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Aug 28, 2024 16:42:47 GMT -5
I chuckle every time I hear or read the term "deep state". I could go along with bloated bureaucracy, or government workers covering their own asses, but "deep state". Nah. Don't even know what that really means. Neither do the ones using the term.
The word boogeyman seems more to the point.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Aug 28, 2024 17:54:07 GMT -5
I chuckle every time I hear or read the term "deep state". I could go along with bloated bureaucracy, or government workers covering their own asses, but "deep state". Nah. Don't even know what that really means. It's a gentle way of saying those who should be hanged Violence is the first rule of MAGA.
|
|
|
Post by 4ward on Aug 28, 2024 18:20:30 GMT -5
I chuckle every time I hear or read the term "deep state". I could go along with bloated bureaucracy, or government workers covering their own asses, but "deep state". Nah. Don't even know what that really means. Neither do the ones using the term.
The word boogeyman seems more to the point.
No boogeyman here, Granddad taught us all about the “HootNanny” though. HootNanny seems more to the point. LOL
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Aug 28, 2024 18:24:45 GMT -5
It's a gentle way of saying those who should be hanged Violence is the first rule of MAGA. Don't know about maga, but in ok with violence
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Aug 28, 2024 18:27:12 GMT -5
Violence is the first rule of MAGA. Don't know about maga, but in ok with violence No shit.
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Aug 28, 2024 19:26:57 GMT -5
Don't know about maga, but in ok with violence No shit. The second federal employees illegally contact a private business to have them control a narrative, your rights have been violated. Seems like you would care.....
|
|
|
Post by walkerdog on Aug 28, 2024 19:32:52 GMT -5
I see the usual suspects are doing their best to downplay the seriousness of the issue……..
and faliing….. as usual.🙄
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Aug 28, 2024 19:44:01 GMT -5
I see the usual suspects are doing their best to downplay the seriousness of the issue…….. and faliing….. as usual.🙄 I think it's a case of lust. They have an addiction to a thick greasy pecker. They would never speak I'll of their pimps
|
|
|
Post by Tarponator on Aug 28, 2024 20:22:03 GMT -5
Nothing says serious like a thick greasy pecker.
|
|