|
Post by bullfrog on Jul 26, 2024 18:50:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Jul 26, 2024 23:51:11 GMT -5
^ Still doesn't explain the miraculous healing of a 2cm wound, does it?
|
|
|
Post by PolarsStepdad on Jul 27, 2024 0:25:08 GMT -5
^ Still doesn't explain the miraculous healing of a 2cm wound, does it? Shouldn't the wound he closer to 5.56mm?
|
|
|
Post by throttle on Jul 27, 2024 8:18:00 GMT -5
Fucking clueless libs, grasping straws as if they represent profundities... Proudly displaying their ignorance for all to see... What difference, at this point, does it make, whether the ear was nicked by a bullet or a fragment thereof, or whether it was a splinter of glass? The seriousness of the assassination attempt is not in question. Clueless libs "informed" by the democrat media may not be aware, but an innocent guy's head was exploded by the assassin's bullet just beyond the actual target, Donald Trump. Perhaps, as a vendor of koolaid, you should try to refrain from getting high on your own supply.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jul 27, 2024 8:21:47 GMT -5
2cm is about the length of a 5.56mm bullet, depending on type. Most are a bit longer than 2cm. The bullet went through the ear while the ear was almost perpendicular to it. It wouldn’t have been a clean bullet hole. It would have looked more like a long tear in the ear.
Where’s the problem?
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jul 27, 2024 8:32:42 GMT -5
Wouldn't a bullet fragment be shrapnel? All the FBI director said was "there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel" that hit the former president. If the bullet fragmented wouldn't that be shrapnel that hit Trump? It seems the FBI director said the same thing as the statement from the FBI said.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jul 27, 2024 8:49:36 GMT -5
Wouldn't a bullet fragment be shrapnel? All the FBI director said was "there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel" that hit the former president. If the bullet fragmented wouldn't that be shrapnel that hit Trump? It seems the FBI director said the same thing as the statement from the FBI said. Pieces of another object a bullet hit can also be shrapnel. Although usage of the term is probably improper either way, where it usually means metal from an explosion where the metal is a purposeful part of the explosion, something designed in the bomb to cast metal at high velocity or force. If you define shrapnel as accidental or incidental fragments that strike people from an errant bullet, then glass or other materials can also be shrapnel. Again, we see the first bullet right after it passed through Trump’s ear on camera. It hadn’t hit anything else by the time Trump clutched his ear between the first and second shots.
|
|
|
Post by dragonbait on Jul 27, 2024 8:51:51 GMT -5
Through his ear, yet 10 days later not a scratch can be seen Praise be baby jebus
|
|
|
Post by garycoleco on Jul 27, 2024 9:14:54 GMT -5
Through his ear, yet 10 days later not a scratch can be seen Praise be baby jebus Where are the pictures you took when doing the examination?
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jul 27, 2024 10:08:12 GMT -5
Wouldn't a bullet fragment be shrapnel? All the FBI director said was "there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel" that hit the former president. If the bullet fragmented wouldn't that be shrapnel that hit Trump? It seems the FBI director said the same thing as the statement from the FBI said. Pieces of another object a bullet hit can also be shrapnel. Although usage of the term is probably improper either way, where it usually means metal from an explosion where the metal is a purposeful part of the explosion, something designed in the bomb to cast metal at high velocity or force. If you define shrapnel as accidental or incidental fragments that strike people from an errant bullet, then glass or other materials can also be shrapnel. Again, we see the first bullet right after it passed through Trump’s ear on camera. It hadn’t hit anything else by the time Trump clutched his ear between the first and second shots. The photos of his ear before and after show no bullet or fragment went through it. Whatever it was grazed the very top edge of his ear. If it was a bullet and it may have been, it just grazed the ear. This could easily be solved by Trump releasing the hospital medical records. It could clarify a lot instead of hearsay and guessing as we are doing.
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Jul 27, 2024 10:09:56 GMT -5
"It could easily be solved if he just released his birth certificate...."
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Jul 27, 2024 10:14:37 GMT -5
"It could easily be solved if he just released his birth certificate...." That did work out in his favor. Bunch of tards droning on about how he’s not a real American.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jul 27, 2024 10:16:22 GMT -5
"It could easily be solved if he just released his birth certificate...." But he did release his birth certificate.
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Jul 27, 2024 10:49:11 GMT -5
Immaterial...........doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Post by toldya on Jul 27, 2024 11:09:43 GMT -5
Pieces of another object a bullet hit can also be shrapnel. Although usage of the term is probably improper either way, where it usually means metal from an explosion where the metal is a purposeful part of the explosion, something designed in the bomb to cast metal at high velocity or force. If you define shrapnel as accidental or incidental fragments that strike people from an errant bullet, then glass or other materials can also be shrapnel. Again, we see the first bullet right after it passed through Trump’s ear on camera. It hadn’t hit anything else by the time Trump clutched his ear between the first and second shots. The photos of his ear before and after show no bullet or fragment went through it. Whatever it was grazed the very top edge of his ear. If it was a bullet and it may have been, it just grazed the ear. This could easily be solved by Trump releasing the hospital medical records. It could clarify a lot instead of hearsay and guessing as we are doing. You ever get high Cad ? If not, you might need to try it . This is the type of stuff you talk about when passing the bowl around. This is not normal discussion .
|
|