|
Post by toldya on Jul 10, 2024 19:25:58 GMT -5
That's your opinion ,but I think the arguments in court will be that he was action in an official capacity. We'll see. It is the Constitution's opinion that the state control the elections and choosing electors. The courts have supported that opinion for the last almost 250 years. Even this SCOTUS would have a difficult time rationalising many of Trump's actions as "official duties" It would be improper to allow a President to use his powers to try and negate the State's power over it's choosing of electors. no matter what his "personal" feelings were. Those "feelings" could be influenced by his loss in the election or his ego unable to accept defeat. I don't make predictions on how a case will turn out. I just look at what I think will come up and what has come up. The recent ruling by the SCOTUS may be beneficial to my guy , so I was glad to see it.
|
|
|
Immunity
Jul 10, 2024 22:42:47 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by illinoisfisherman on Jul 10, 2024 22:42:47 GMT -5
TDS 🤯
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Jul 11, 2024 12:14:59 GMT -5
It is the Constitution's opinion that the state control the elections and choosing electors. The courts have supported that opinion for the last almost 250 years. Even this SCOTUS would have a difficult time rationalising many of Trump's actions as "official duties" It would be improper to allow a President to use his powers to try and negate the State's power over it's choosing of electors. no matter what his "personal" feelings were. Those "feelings" could be influenced by his loss in the election or his ego unable to accept defeat. I don't make predictions on how a case will turn out. I just look at what I think will come up and what has come up. The recent ruling by the SCOTUS may be beneficial to my guy , so I was glad to see it. That same ruling allows the sitting President to defend the nation against domestic enemies such as Trump as part of his official duties. You can expect the drone strikes on Mar-a- Cago before January 21st.
|
|