|
Post by tonyroma on Jun 11, 2024 14:05:12 GMT -5
The gun charges are a smokescreen. They want everyone to think that this all there is. The laptop and the information on it shows how corrupt tha Biden family is and the payoff’s that foreign governments have paid them. And yes, those 51 government officials should be prosecuted and be stripped of their security clearances. If only they had congressional hearings they could get to the bottom of this.
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Jun 11, 2024 14:09:38 GMT -5
^ Oh look, a conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 11, 2024 14:11:01 GMT -5
Give us the statistics on how many times a person has been prosecuted for lying on the federal form to purchase a firearm, where a more serious crime was not involved. it is very rare for a prosecutor to bring those charges unless the person was a known felon or involved in other illegal activity. I would bet thousands of pot smokers have bought guns without any issue and lied on the form about using drugs. Neither prosecutor should have brought these to court. They should have been settled with a slap on the wrist, but politics got in the way of both. They both broke the law and both were found guilty. Now we wait on the sentencing hearings. You’re stating my position. ol cads a sneaky toad, very rare, thousands of pot smokers, known felon, he,s trying to make a excuse for hunter, its not just joe he cant bring himself to admit was wrong for anything but also his semen, that being hunter.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 11, 2024 14:11:22 GMT -5
well it was a witch hunt, lot more of this garbage still to come i think. just my opinion. no trump charges no hunter charges. i would be worried if i was one of the 51 traitors who lied and signed the laptop letter if trump does get elected. That’s the real scandal. Prominent members of the Intelligence Community publicly said the laptop was a Russian hoax. Either they’re partisan liars, or they’re incompetent at their jobs. Either way, they’re not fit for their jobs and their heads should role for it. You might want to read what they actually said at the time. Due to the involvement of Giuliani and the way he was shopping the story and Giuliani's connection to Russian actors known to spread disinformation. they said it had the earmarks of Russian disinformation campaign. No wheres was the word hoax used nor did they say it was a fact that it was a russian plot but due to the players involved it appeared very likely it could be. www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 11, 2024 14:13:26 GMT -5
well the laptop is still being held by the fbi, the fake russian collusion disinformation laptop.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 11, 2024 14:15:02 GMT -5
Give us the statistics on how many times a person has been prosecuted for lying on the federal form to purchase a firearm, where a more serious crime was not involved. it is very rare for a prosecutor to bring those charges unless the person was a known felon or involved in other illegal activity. I would bet thousands of pot smokers have bought guns without any issue and lied on the form about using drugs. Neither prosecutor should have brought these to court. They should have been settled with a slap on the wrist, but politics got in the way of both. They both broke the law and both were found guilty. Now we wait on the sentencing hearings. You’re stating my position. Your position was Trump's was 100 times more stupid and you do not think he committed a crime. My position is they were equally stupid and both committed a crime not worth prosecuting except for the politics involved.
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Jun 11, 2024 14:18:41 GMT -5
That’s the real scandal. Prominent members of the Intelligence Community publicly said the laptop was a Russian hoax. Either they’re partisan liars, or they’re incompetent at their jobs. Either way, they’re not fit for their jobs and their heads should role for it. You might want to read what they actually said at the time. Due to the involvement of Giuliani and the way he was shopping the story and Giuliani's connection to Russian actors known to spread disinformation. they said it had the earmarks of Russian disinformation campaign. No wheres was the word hoax used nor did they say it was a fact that it was a russian plot but due to the players involved it appeared very likely it could be. www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000 OMG,,,,,,, YOU ARE INSANE. CYCLIST FOR MODERATOR.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 11, 2024 14:20:27 GMT -5
That’s the real scandal. Prominent members of the Intelligence Community publicly said the laptop was a Russian hoax. Either they’re partisan liars, or they’re incompetent at their jobs. Either way, they’re not fit for their jobs and their heads should role for it. You might want to read what they actually said at the time. Due to the involvement of Giuliani and the way he was shopping the story and Giuliani's connection to Russian actors known to spread disinformation. they said it had the earmarks of Russian disinformation campaign. No wheres was the word hoax used nor did they say it was a fact that it was a russian plot but due to the players involved it appeared very likely it could be. www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000Come now. Misinformation means hoax.
|
|
|
Post by bullfrog on Jun 11, 2024 14:24:52 GMT -5
You’re stating my position. Your position was Trump's was 100 times more stupid and you do not think he committed a crime. My position is they were equally stupid and both committed a crime not worth prosecuting except for the politics involved. Trump’s is a 100 more times more stupid. That doesn’t mean Hunter’s isn’t a chicken crap charge. My point is that if Hunter’s charge is somewhat chicken crap, Trump’s is many more times. A drug addict buying a gun is more important than Trump labeling a hush money settlement as a “legal expenses” instead of more specifically saying “hush money to whore,” is it not? Hunter also still has pretty serious tax charges pending, does he not?
|
|
|
Post by tonyroma on Jun 11, 2024 14:27:35 GMT -5
So does Trump, git’um Nikon😉. Last I heard was 100 million, should be no problem with the 5 billion windfall.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 11, 2024 14:35:10 GMT -5
You might want to read what they actually said at the time. Due to the involvement of Giuliani and the way he was shopping the story and Giuliani's connection to Russian actors known to spread disinformation. they said it had the earmarks of Russian disinformation campaign. No wheres was the word hoax used nor did they say it was a fact that it was a russian plot but due to the players involved it appeared very likely it could be. www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000 OMG,,,,,,, YOU ARE INSANE. CYCLIST FOR MODERATOR. Coming from you, the guy who doesn't live in reality or read or pay his bills.
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Jun 11, 2024 14:39:11 GMT -5
Your position was Trump's was 100 times more stupid and you do not think he committed a crime. My position is they were equally stupid and both committed a crime not worth prosecuting except for the politics involved. Trump’s is a 100 more times more stupid. That doesn’t mean Hunter’s isn’t a chicken crap charge. My point is that if Hunter’s charge is somewhat chicken crap, Trump’s is many more times. A drug addict buying a gun is more important than Trump labeling a hush money settlement as a “legal expenses” instead of more specifically saying “hush money to whore,” is it not? Hunter also still has pretty serious tax charges pending, does he not? He shouldn't have, he already paid the back taxes, which is all the iRS wanted. It is another political case that should not be going to court. The IRS says Trump owes $100 million over false deductions, should they file more criminal charges against Trump over that one? You pay the taxes and move on in 99% of cases. The only ones who get charged are those who refuse to pay.
|
|
|
Post by mapper on Jun 11, 2024 14:45:37 GMT -5
OK so if these laws or rules are only on the books to be for which Hunt purposes and nothing else, why don't we repeal or nullify them? Sarcasm on I mean there're victims who did nothing wrong, right? Sarcasm off
If a law exists enforce it.
Mere commoners can be caught in the wich hunt rules..they are there to make an example for someone.
|
|
|
Post by tampaspicer on Jun 11, 2024 14:47:00 GMT -5
Hunter broke the law just like Donald did. I say convict them all if they are breaking the law. Same thing would and should happen to us if we did too. You have admitted on this forum to using Molly. Molly is illegal in Florida and a felony. I do not see anyone coming for you. You think they should come after you next? This trial was a political hit job just like the Trump trial(s). I don't do molly NEXT
|
|
|
Post by conchydong on Jun 11, 2024 14:52:14 GMT -5
You have admitted on this forum to using Molly. Molly is illegal in Florida and a felony. I do not see anyone coming for you. You think they should come after you next? This trial was a political hit job just like the Trump trial(s). I don't do molly NEXT I’d do Molly depending on what she looks like.😉
|
|