Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2024 13:59:34 GMT -5
Quit dodging the question. What were these foreign entities given in exchange for the millions of dollars they gave to the Biden Family? What did they get? No one is accusing “Joe the Mindless Puppet” of anything - YET. Just tell us what the foreign countries, most of them adversaries of the United States, get in exchange for the millions of dollars. WHAT? Cite something legit! Your word alone is bs. Just continue with your “shucking and jiving”. Keep dancing around the question because you have no answer to the serious question of the conspiracies of the Biden family scandal. The federal investigators have honestly and diligently uncovered payments from various persons connected to Russia, China and the Ukraine. By the way what ever happened to the diamond from the mayor of Moscow? Hmmmm |
|
|
|
Post by misterjr on Apr 8, 2024 14:04:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by biminitwisted on Apr 8, 2024 14:23:37 GMT -5
Cite something legit! Your word alone is bs. Just continue with your “shucking and jiving”. Keep dancing around the question because you have no answer to the serious question of the conspiracies of the Biden family scandal. The federal investigators have honestly and diligently uncovered payments from various persons connected to Russia, China and the Ukraine. By the way what ever happened to the diamond from the mayor of Moscow? Hmmmm Yet no charges, hmmm |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 8, 2024 17:26:19 GMT -5
NOT A GOD DAMNED THING. IT WAS A CON JOB, THEY SOLD AN ILLUSION. It is why Hunter was sued for non delivery of his services. Why would Biden risk his reputation, his millions, and his family name when he didn't have to? He just makes it appear that he is part of the Hunter operation by showing up to say hi or conveniently call while Hunter was meeting. It creates an illusion without any real substance behind it. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE OF ANY OF YOUR CLAIMS. Solid evidence, not twitter posts. You can't because there is none. You are still evading the question. Where is your evidence of such claims. Just because you or some other Trump supporter says it, it does not make it true. Bank records don’t lie. Face the facts, you got lied to and duped by the Russia hoax. You got lied too and duped by the China virus/ vaccine hoax and now the same people you believe and support are lying to you again. By the way, tell us how someone who has lived on a government salary is able to afford the lifestyle and real estate that Biden has? What bank records? The loan payments to Joe Biden that was a few thousand dollars. That was easily explained. There is zero evidence to connect Biden that would hold up in court. Lots of suspicion, but that is it. Biden did what a lot of other politicians did. Wrote books, speaking engagements, career as a lawyer and professor at a university. Trump was the guy in charge during Covid and the first Vaccine approved. He was the liar in chief at the time |
|
|
|
Post by johngalt on Apr 9, 2024 8:28:54 GMT -5
Bank records don’t lie. Face the facts, you got lied to and duped by the Russia hoax. You got lied too and duped by the China virus/ vaccine hoax and now the same people you believe and support are lying to you again. By the way, tell us how someone who has lived on a government salary is able to afford the lifestyle and real estate that Biden has? What bank records? The loan payments to Joe Biden that was a few thousand dollars. That was easily explained. There is zero evidence to connect Biden that would hold up in court. Lots of suspicion, but that is it. Biden did what a lot of other politicians did. Wrote books, speaking engagements, career as a lawyer and professor at a university. Trump was the guy in charge during Covid and the first Vaccine approved. He was the liar in chief at the time Nice dancing there. 😂 Now I know why you guys dropped the old web site. 😉 You and some others had so much egg on your faces you had to clean up somehow. 😉 By the way, how many books that Biden wrote are in your library?😁 |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 9:54:56 GMT -5
What bank records? The loan payments to Joe Biden that was a few thousand dollars. That was easily explained. There is zero evidence to connect Biden that would hold up in court. Lots of suspicion, but that is it. Biden did what a lot of other politicians did. Wrote books, speaking engagements, career as a lawyer and professor at a university. Trump was the guy in charge during Covid and the first Vaccine approved. He was the liar in chief at the time Nice dancing there. 😂 Now I know why you guys dropped the old web site. 😉 You and some others had so much egg on your faces you had to clean up somehow. 😉 By the way, how many books that Biden wrote are in your library?😁 I am just pointing out the facts you can't see through those Trump sunglasses. all you know is what Trump spouts and you follow him like Jesus. I know they are both crooked old senile bastards who are unfit to be President. I support neither one of these morons. I do like facts and the facts are, there is no evidence on Biden. If they take it to court, it will fail and make the Republicans look bad, that is why they don't do anything. As I said, he was likely part of the Hunter con job that made Hunter a few million. But Biden has himself insulated from the whole thing and Hunter is the only guy who could expose him and that ain't happening. Every Ex-President, VP, and many well-known congressional representatives make millions during and after office by writing books, doing speaking engagements, and marketing their celebrity status. Obama gets up to $400,000 a speech. Biden and his wife both had multi-million dollar book deals. I have never read any book written by any of these ex-presidents or VPs. Here is a nice article about Biden's earnings www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2020/10/22/how-the-bidens-earned-167-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/?sh=ad4f0ef1e421 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2024 10:56:38 GMT -5
Ok. Let’s answer the questions one by one.
1) what were the 20+ shell companies set up for?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2024 10:58:38 GMT -5
2) The daunting unanswered question- What did the Biden family do or supply to the enemy foreign entities for the millions of dollars and diamonds that they received.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2024 10:59:42 GMT -5
Money and shell companies usually mean money laundering. Were the Bidens guilty of money laundering?
|
|
|
|
Post by ferris1248 on Apr 9, 2024 12:16:59 GMT -5
I've got a couple or 3 shell companies. Does that make me guilty of money laundering?
Not at all. They exist just in case I run up on an opportunity or hit the lottery.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2024 12:22:28 GMT -5
I've got a couple or 3 shell companies. Does that make me guilty of money laundering? Not at all. They exist just in case I run up on an opportunity or hit the lottery. 😊😂👍 But not 20 !👎 |
|
|
|
Post by meateater on Apr 9, 2024 12:28:16 GMT -5
anyone who is all in defending trump or biden is a mental case , vote for whoevers policies you think will improve the country but dont try to defend or make excuses for them, both are crooked as hell and in cyclists words it makes you look like a dumb fucking maga racist pedophile hair sniffing sleepy retard.
|
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 13:01:31 GMT -5
Ok. Let’s answer the questions one by one. 1) what were the 20+ shell companies set up for? They were not "shell companies". At least, not used as the Republicans wanted you to think. That was just a Republican trigger word added to get people like you upset. I doubt you know what a "shell company" is, but it sounded bad when you heard it. Hell, Digital World Acquisition Corp that merged with Trump media was a shell company. It's only purpose was to raise capital and merge with Trump Media to create DJT. Hunter had various companies with various partners and some he operated himself. One of the claimed "shell companies" was his law firm. All but 3 or 4 had legitimate websites and operated a legitimate business. There was nothing to indicate what the 3 or 4 did, but that is not unusual either. It is pretty common for people dealing with large sums of money to have multiple companies for various business and tax reasons. Whether or not illicit funds were diverted through them is another question. So far they have not been able to find any evidence of any illegal activity, other than Hunter not paying taxes and buying a gun while doing drugs. Hunter was likely hoping to dodge some taxes, but he apparently failed. Trump owns 100s of companies for various investments, partnerships, and business concerns. I am sure a few of his are "shell companies" to dodge taxes. It isn't uncommon or illegal. It isn't anything that would be evidence of a crime unless you can prove they were used for illegal activity. There has been no evidence to date to prove that. It would be nice if they found some evidence on Joe Biden, but, as I said before, the only person who could tie Joe to Hunter's activities, is Hunter, and he ain't talking and he never will. Well maybe after Joe passes on. Then Hunter may write a best seller and collect another few million. |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 13:04:36 GMT -5
Money and shell companies usually mean money laundering. Were the Bidens guilty of money laundering? Then I guess Digital World Acquisition Corp was money laundering. It was nothing but money and a shell company until the merger. Lots of companies out there like that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2024 13:05:31 GMT -5
They haven’t much to worry about. Joe will pardon everyone as soon as he can without a doubt
|
|
|
|
Post by olmucky on Apr 9, 2024 13:06:18 GMT -5
Money and shell companies usually mean money laundering. Were the Bidens guilty of money laundering? Then I guess Digital World Acquisition Corp was money laundering. It was nothing but money and a shell company until the merger. Lots of companies out there like that. Does that make it ok? |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 13:23:09 GMT -5
Then I guess Digital World Acquisition Corp was money laundering. It was nothing but money and a shell company until the merger. Lots of companies out there like that. Does that make it ok? I think Digital World Acquisition Corp was O.K. and legal. Do you think they were money launderers that Trump got into bed with? |
|
|
|
Post by olmucky on Apr 9, 2024 13:27:29 GMT -5
I think Digital World Acquisition Corp was O.K. and legal. Do you think they were money launderers that Trump got into bed with? He was with digital world? Or someone else? |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 13:31:37 GMT -5
They haven’t much to worry about. Joe will pardon everyone as soon as he can without a doubt I said that six months ago. After the election in November, there is no downside for Biden to pardon Hunter. Then the issue is dead and over. If Trump wins, he will want to and try to get Biden, but IF Biden hands out pardons like I think he will, trump will be as successful as he was putting Hillary in Jail. Trump's got the bigger worry, if he loses the election, he is toast. |
|
|
|
Post by cadman on Apr 9, 2024 13:40:15 GMT -5
I think Digital World Acquisition Corp was O.K. and legal. Do you think they were money launderers that Trump got into bed with? He was with digital world? Or someone else? DWAC was a shell company formed to raise capital to merge with Trump media. It had no business purpose other than to raise funds. Once the merger happened, the name was changed to Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. DJT was not an IPO but a merger of two companies. Trump's and DWAC, a shell corporation. So Trump got into bed with the shell company to go public without an IPO. |
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:28:27 GMT -5
Correct that is the legal reason to have a shell corporation. Now running foreign money through several is normally to throw the hounds off the fox trail.
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:33:46 GMT -5
Ziochevsky stated it will take investigators 10 years to uncover the illicit payments to the Bidens. He is the Burisma executive coerced by the Bidens.
|
|
|
|
Post by cyclist on Apr 9, 2024 15:39:32 GMT -5
Ziochevsky stated it will take investigators 10 years to uncover the illicit payments to the Bidens. He is the Burisma executive coerced by the Bidens.
WASHINGTON — The Ukrainian oligarch Republicans claim bribed Joe Biden said he never actually talked to Biden, according to an interview transcript made public Thursday by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.).
Mykola Zlochevsky is a co-founder of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma that employed Biden’s son Hunter for several years. Zlochevsky served as Ukraine’s energy minister, but has been in hiding since fleeing corruption charges.
Republicans claim there’s evidence a Burisma executive — apparently Zlochevsky — paid Joe Biden a $5 million bribe when he was vice president in exchange for an official favor. They’ve demanded the FBI hand over a document reflecting a confidential source’s conversation with Zlochevsky.
Raskin has now countered with a document of his own — a three-page transcript of a 2019 interview between Zlochevsky and an acquaintance of Rudy Giuliani, who at the time was publicly seeking dirt on Biden on behalf of then-President Donald Trump.
“No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him during Hunter Biden’s engagement” with Burisma, Zlochevsky says in the transcript.
When asked if the vice president had assisted him or his company “in any way,” Zlochevsky says no.
In 2015, however, a Burisma executive named Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden in an email for having had the chance to meet his father at a charity dinner, though other guests told The New York Times they didn’t recall the elder Biden having a substantive conversation with Pozharskyi.
Politico in 2020 reported the contents of the Zlochevsky transcript, and Democrats have repeatedly referred to it in response to Republican claims that the FBI is withholding derogatory material against Biden. Democrats obtained the transcript in 2019 in their impeachment inquiry into Trump for pressuring Ukraine to announce a sham investigation of the Bidens.
Raskin has said FBI officials told him the Justice Department assessed the derogatory material on Biden and found it wasn’t worth formally investigating, but the bureau has declined to make any public statements to that effect. So Raskin has turned to what lawmakers already have on hand from Zlochevsky.
“Despite being interviewed as part of a campaign by Mr. Giuliani and his proxies in 2019 and 2020 to procure damaging information about the Biden family, Mr. Zlochevsky explicitly and unequivocally denied those allegations,” Raskin said in a letter to House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) on Thursday.
“Mr. Zlochevsky’s statements are just one of the many that have debunked the corruption allegations against President Biden that were first leveled by Rudy Giuliani and have been reviewed by former President Trump’s own Justice Department,” Raskin said.
In response, Comer insisted the FBI’s tip from a confidential human source who spoke to the Burisma executive has nothing to do with Giuliani. (He has not explicitly said the source is Zlochevsky, but has noted the source is in hiding. Other Republicans, including Giuliani, have named Zlochevsky.)
“The Burisma executive claims then-Vice President Biden solicited and received a $5 million bribe in exchange for certain actions,” Comer said in a statement on Thursday. “The executive also claims he didn’t pay ‘the big guy’ directly but used so many bank accounts that it would take ten years to unravel.”
State Department officials have said they considered Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board during his father’s vice presidency awkward because it looked like a conflict of interest. Joe Biden at the time was the face of the U.S. government’s Ukraine policy and urged the country to root out corruption, including by firing its top prosecutor.
Trump dispatched Giuliani to find evidence that Biden’s action was designed to protect his son, but Republicans have been unable to substantiate claims that the elder Biden bent U.S. foreign policy in his family’s favor. An investigation by Senate Republicans in 2020 concluded it was “not clear” that Hunter Biden’s position with Burisma affected the U.S. government’s stance toward Ukraine.
Nevertheless, Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have kept the story alive this year, seizing on the FBI’s refusal to hand over unverified raw material to argue the bureau is protecting the Bidens.
They have stepped up their efforts following this month’s federal indictment of Donald Trump on Espionage Act charges.
On Wednesday, Comer asked the Treasury Department to hand over any “suspicious activity reports” filed by banks on accounts related to Zlochevsky and other Burisma executives. In his letter to Treasury, Comer claimed his committee “has reviewed government documents that allege President Biden, while serving as Vice President, solicited and received a bribe from a foreign source in return for certain actions.”
Other Republicans have suggested that Zlochevksy might not be a credible source. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), for instance, said earlier this month that the bribery allegation “could be coming from a very corrupt oligarch who could be making this stuff up.”
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:42:36 GMT -5
Raskin LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:44:07 GMT -5
Hmmmmm State Department officials have said they considered Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board during his father’s vice presidency awkward because it looked like a conflict of interest. Joe Biden at the time was the face of the U.S. government’s Ukraine policy and urged the country to root out corruption, including by firing its top prosecutor.
|
|
|
|
Post by luapnor on Apr 9, 2024 15:44:46 GMT -5
The Biden experiment is a total failure by every metric.
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:44:54 GMT -5
Thought they were just following state department orders. Guess not
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 15:49:32 GMT -5
No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him during Hunter Biden’s engagement” with Burisma, Classic Raskin spin. NO CONTACT EXCEPT HUNTER HIS SON WAS ON THE BOARD. WTF am I taking crazy pills. How is that no contact?
|
|
|
|
Post by cyclist on Apr 9, 2024 16:04:25 GMT -5
Hmmmmm State Department officials have said they considered Hunter Biden’s role on Burisma’s board during his father’s vice presidency awkward because it looked like a conflict of interest. Joe Biden at the time was the face of the U.S. government’s Ukraine policy and urged the country to root out corruption, including by firing its top prosecutor. Old story and kinda wrong. The top prosecutor was corrupt and Biden went after him, so did other world leaders.
|
|
|
|
Post by osprey11 on Apr 9, 2024 16:40:30 GMT -5
So why did they need crackhead Hunter on their board? Certainly not to buy influence nah
|
|
